The Problem
Manual code review is time-consuming and inconsistent. Senior developers spend hours reviewing PRs, often missing subtle bugs or style violations due to fatigue. Teams need a way to automate the repetitive parts of code review while maintaining quality standards.
The Solution
Build an AI-powered code review agent on Flezi AgentBox that automatically analyzes pull requests, identifies potential bugs, enforces your team's coding standards, and suggests improvements — all before a human reviewer even looks at the code.
How It Works
Configure the Agent — In the Builder Lab, define your agent's review criteria: language rules, style guide preferences, security checks, and performance patterns to watch for.
Set the Persona — Configure a BMAD-style persona for consistent reviews. Set tone to "Analytical", expertise to "Code Quality & Security", and style to "Ultra-succinct with file paths and line references."
Connect to Your Repository — Set up a webhook trigger so the agent activates automatically whenever a new PR is opened or updated.
Review & Iterate — The agent posts findings with specific line-by-line feedback, severity ratings, and suggested fixes.
Real Example: Live Output from Flezi AgentBox
This is actual output from the BMAD Code Reviewer agent running on Flezi AgentBox with Gemini, reviewing a function with a SQL injection vulnerability:
Input:
function getUserData(userId: string) {
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;
const result = db.execute(query);
return result;
}Agent Output (2.9 seconds, Gemini 2.0 Flash):
## Findings
### [CRITICAL] Security: SQL Injection Vulnerability
**File:** src/index.ts:2
**Issue:** Directly embedding `userId` into the SQL query string
allows for SQL injection.
**Fix:** Use parameterized queries or prepared statements.
### [LOW] Correctness: Missing Error Handling
**File:** src/index.ts:3
**Issue:** The code lacks error handling for the database query.
**Fix:** Implement try-catch blocks to gracefully handle errors.The agent uses a structured output format with severity levels (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW), file paths, and concrete fix suggestions. Try it live on the marketplace with the "Try with Sample" button.
Building This Agent in the Builder Lab
Phase 1: Discovery Canvas
Place sticky notes to define your agent's review scope:
| Note Category | Example Content | |---------------|----------------| | Goal (Blue) | Find security vulnerabilities, style violations, and bugs | | Risk (Red) | SQL injection, XSS, command injection | | Constraint (Amber) | Output must include file path and line number | | Persona (Pink) | Senior SE, ultra-succinct, analytical | | Metric (Green) | Severity rating per finding |
Phase 2: Logic Studio
Build a 4-node DAG:
- Load Code Context (Service node) — Receives code input
- Analyze Quality Facets (Function node) — Runs security, correctness, performance checks
- Severity Filter (Gate node) — Sorts findings by CRITICAL to LOW
- Review Report (Data node) — Outputs structured markdown
Phase 3: Output Terminal
The synthesis engine generates the agent blueprint with the persona config and DAG wired together. Click Publish to make it live on the marketplace.
Key Features
- Multi-language support — Review TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, and more
- Custom rule sets — Define your team's specific standards
- Security scanning — Flag OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
- Performance hints — Identify N+1 queries, memory leaks, and inefficient algorithms
- Auto-fix suggestions — Generate corrected code snippets
- Structured output — Severity levels, file references, and fix code
Agent Configuration
name: "BMAD Code Reviewer"
persona:
tone: "Analytical"
expertise: "Code Quality & Security"
style: "Ultra-succinct, file paths and line references"
llm:
model: "gemini-2.0-flash"
temperature: 0.3
max_tokens: 4096
dag:
nodes:
- { id: "n1", type: "service", label: "Load Code Context" }
- { id: "n2", type: "function", label: "Analyze Quality Facets" }
- { id: "n3", type: "gate", label: "Severity Filter" }
- { id: "n4", type: "data", label: "Review Report" }Results
Teams using automated code review agents on Flezi AgentBox report:
- 60% faster PR review cycles
- 40% fewer bugs reaching production
- 2.9s average response time with Gemini 2.0 Flash
- Consistent enforcement of coding standards across the team
Start with security rules first — they provide the highest ROI and are least likely to produce false positives.